Sphinx dating controversy

Like many other recent contributions to the 'prehistory debate', which reframes old questions, and thereby raise many more, he has broadened the scope of his research to include the dynamic recent history of the Solar System - itself under review as we enter the 21st century.

This new appreciation of 'just how dynamic' has been the recent history of the Solar System in which our planet Earth exists, is directly responsible for a new understanding of the periodic rise and collapse of civilisations over the past several millennia.

First, as Lawton and Ogilvie-Herald point out, the salts in the limestone of the Giza plateau cause rapid erosion.

Second, the Neolithic Wet Phase continued until the Fourth Dynasty when the pyramids were built." "Based on the author's work in Egypt in the 1880s, this unusual volume addresses one of history's greatest puzzles -- how were the pyramids of Gizeh built?

Did cultures ranging across vast spaces in geography and time, such as the ancient Egyptians; early Buddhists; the Maya, Inca, Toltec, and Aztec civilizations of the Americas; the Celts of the British Isles; and even the Mississippi Indians of pre-Columbian Illinois, simply dream the same dreams and envision the same structures?

"GIZA: The Truth is one of those long awaited books that presents a more complete history of the Giza plateau than has been previously published by both the 'alternative' and 'orthodox camps'.

He gives his reasons for concluding this in great detail in his controversial book "Voices of the Rocks", and has become for many the definitive expert on the dating of the Great Sphinx on the Giza plateau.

On January 27th 2000, another controversial 'alternative historian', David Rohl, in an article in the UK "Daily Express", said of this: "However, the alternative movement, led by Bauval, is predicting that beyond the door lies a repository of knowledge which will prove the existence of a lost civilisation dating to around 12,000 years ago - the sacred scrolls or tablets of Atlantis. The hero worship surrounding Hancock and Bauval would rapidly wane if no such evidence came to light.

So far, their theories have, in part, been sustained by their ability to claim that the proof is just around the corner but that they are being thwarted by the powers-that-be.

Before Petrie undertook this study, the Great Pyramid was a byword for paradox - something that was generally familiar, yet not accurately known.

No measurements or detailed examination had been performed.

Search for sphinx dating controversy:

sphinx dating controversy-68sphinx dating controversy-3

If the more adventurous astronomers and astro-physicists are correct, and a giant comet entered our Solar System sometime in the past 20,000 years, fragmenting into many pieces, with each creating their own particular debris stream, then it would seem very unusual if ancient peoples around the world would have been unaware of the spectacular celestial displays that encounters with these meteor streams would have generated.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “sphinx dating controversy”